<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.comments</id><updated>2012-06-02T05:38:40.589-07:00</updated><category term='Sole Source'/><category term='Legislation'/><category term='Federal Contracting'/><category term='Contract Administration'/><category term='Surveys'/><category term='Bonds'/><category term='RFP'/><category term='Job Order Contracting'/><category term='Risk Management'/><category term='State Law'/><category term='Dept. of Labor and Industries'/><category term='Business Types'/><category term='Bidding'/><category term='Taxes'/><category term='Debarment'/><category term='Pre-Bid Meetings'/><category term='Contract Disputes'/><category term='Retainage'/><category term='Public Works'/><category term='Project Delivery Systems'/><category term='Audits'/><category term='Union Issues'/><category term='Purchasing'/><category term='Apprenticeship'/><category term='Contract Documents'/><category term='Insurance'/><category term='Subcontractors List'/><category term='Boeing'/><category term='Cost Escalation'/><category term='Utility Coordination'/><category term='Resources'/><category term='Public-Private Partnerships'/><category term='Mike M. Johnson'/><category term='Partnering'/><category term='Fraud'/><category term='Humor'/><category term='Additive Bids'/><category term='Miscellaneous'/><category term='Contract Centralization'/><category term='Change Orders'/><category term='Alternate Bids'/><category term='Ethics'/><category term='Transparency'/><category term='Conflict of Interest'/><category term='CPARB'/><category term='News'/><category term='Disputes Review Board'/><category term='Gov&apos;t Credit Cards'/><category term='NW Minority Business Council'/><category term='Bid Preferences'/><category term='Initiative 200'/><category term='Port of Seattle'/><category term='Pre-qualification'/><category term='Arbitration'/><category term='MWBE'/><category term='Consultant Selection'/><category term='Construction Law'/><category term='Bid Protests'/><category term='DBIA'/><category term='Integrated Project Delivery'/><category term='Design-Build'/><category term='Bid Receipt / Opening'/><category term='Small Works Roster'/><category term='Small Businesses'/><category term='Washington Administrative Code'/><category term='Jobs'/><category term='Mediation'/><category term='Payment / Performance Bonds'/><category term='Lending of Public Credit'/><category term='Maintenance'/><category term='Bidder Responsibility'/><category term='GC/CM'/><category term='Emergency Contracting'/><category term='Prevailing Wages'/><category term='Personal Services Contracts'/><category term='Responsiveness'/><category term='RFQ'/><category term='Events and Conferences'/><category term='Performance Evaluations'/><category term='Best Value Procurement'/><category term='Sustainability'/><category term='Alternative Public Works'/><category term='Court Cases'/><category term='Negotiations'/><category term='Mileage Reimbursement'/><category term='Piggybacking'/><category term='Project Review Committee'/><category term='Training'/><category term='Contract Payments'/><category term='Specifications'/><category term='Consultant Contracts'/><category term='Performance Audits'/><category term='Qualifications Based Selection'/><title type='text'>Mike Purdy's Public Contracting Blog</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/feeds/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/comments/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><author><name>Mike Purdy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15239516189299153384</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>107</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-2331775453369753933</id><published>2012-05-24T08:36:02.314-07:00</published><updated>2012-05-24T08:36:02.314-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Mike -
This was an eye opener for us school distri...</title><content type='html'>Mike -&lt;br /&gt;This was an eye opener for us school districts at the recent WASBO annual conference. A lot (most?) school districts piggyback onto state contracts. With districts riding on a different set of RCW&amp;#39;s and bid requirements, we are concerned we may not be abot to utilized State contracts, so we are waiting for the other shoe to drop. We are betting they do not want to &amp;quot;loose&amp;quot; us customers if their new bid requirements will not meet ours. Some have suggested for us to wait on renewing with DES/GA until all of this has been worked out.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- Darryl Reed&lt;br /&gt;Shoreline School Dist.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/303570489435471138/comments/default/2331775453369753933'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/303570489435471138/comments/default/2331775453369753933'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2012/05/state-charged-with-public-works.html?showComment=1337873762314#c2331775453369753933' title=''/><author><name>Darryl</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15401745655493230404</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2012/05/state-charged-with-public-works.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-303570489435471138' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/303570489435471138' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-482918735'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='May 24, 2012 8:36 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-1992939696437753937</id><published>2012-05-05T15:57:52.957-07:00</published><updated>2012-05-05T15:57:52.957-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Democrats pushed it as a job creation bill, while ...</title><content type='html'>Democrats pushed it as a job creation bill, while Republicans viewed it as costly and an intrusion of government into business.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/6142139767324066340/comments/default/1992939696437753937'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/6142139767324066340/comments/default/1992939696437753937'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2012/04/colorado-kills-bid-preference-bill.html?showComment=1336258672957#c1992939696437753937' title=''/><author><name>Mike Purdy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15239516189299153384</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='09880450309477082950'/><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2012/04/colorado-kills-bid-preference-bill.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-6142139767324066340' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/6142139767324066340' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-611412620'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='May 5, 2012 3:57 PM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-6233159423004794881</id><published>2012-04-30T08:22:02.128-07:00</published><updated>2012-04-30T08:22:02.128-07:00</updated><title type='text'>What was the reasoning behind defeating the bill?</title><content type='html'>What was the reasoning behind defeating the bill?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/6142139767324066340/comments/default/6233159423004794881'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/6142139767324066340/comments/default/6233159423004794881'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2012/04/colorado-kills-bid-preference-bill.html?showComment=1335799322128#c6233159423004794881' title=''/><author><name>Fred</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2012/04/colorado-kills-bid-preference-bill.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-6142139767324066340' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/6142139767324066340' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1207792201'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='April 30, 2012 8:22 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-4759347728229289244</id><published>2012-04-13T13:21:19.886-07:00</published><updated>2012-04-13T13:21:19.886-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Thank you! Just what I was thinking as I reveiwed ...</title><content type='html'>Thank you! Just what I was thinking as I reveiwed the language in one of our bid documents. I was thinking perhaps a formality could be waived, but an informality??? Nonsense! Googled &amp;quot;waive any and all informalities meaning&amp;quot; which led me to your recommendation. Thanks again for pointing out this common yet meaningless phrasing.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/4152944589024018814/comments/default/4759347728229289244'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/4152944589024018814/comments/default/4759347728229289244'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2009/04/waiving-informalities-or-irregularities.html?showComment=1334348479886#c4759347728229289244' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2009/04/waiving-informalities-or-irregularities.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-4152944589024018814' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/4152944589024018814' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-707885427'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='April 13, 2012 1:21 PM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-2533885485764116675</id><published>2012-03-27T11:24:37.298-07:00</published><updated>2012-03-27T11:24:37.298-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Gotta love New Orleans.  I think it will be very i...</title><content type='html'>Gotta love New Orleans.  I think it will be very interesting to see how this plays out.  My guess is that it just spirals away into oblivion.  Seems strange to require contractors to report when they violate the law...why don&amp;#39;t they just not violate the law? :)</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/814888897944157946/comments/default/2533885485764116675'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/814888897944157946/comments/default/2533885485764116675'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2012/03/new-orleans-requires-contractors-to.html?showComment=1332872677298#c2533885485764116675' title=''/><author><name>Scott Wolfe</name><uri>http://www.constructionlienblog.com</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2012/03/new-orleans-requires-contractors-to.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-814888897944157946' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/814888897944157946' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-109170120'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='March 27, 2012 11:24 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-5638705702602249447</id><published>2012-01-21T07:29:45.668-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-21T07:29:45.668-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The elimination of prevailing wages, in and of its...</title><content type='html'>The elimination of prevailing wages, in and of itself, probably wouldn&amp;#39;t be the impetus for shifting to RFPs rather than bids.  I think public agencies are always looking for tools to ensure qualified contractors - whether that&amp;#39;s pre-qualification, responsibility criteria, or selection based on an RFP.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I agree that the sentence about no one being paid a prevailing wage is unnecessary.  By definition, if the law passes, there will be no prevailing wages.  How can they prohibit a contractor from paying something that doesn&amp;#39;t exist?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/5884435328107950255/comments/default/5638705702602249447'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/5884435328107950255/comments/default/5638705702602249447'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2012/01/missouri-proposes-to-eliminate.html?showComment=1327159785668#c5638705702602249447' title=''/><author><name>Mike Purdy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15239516189299153384</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='09880450309477082950'/><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2012/01/missouri-proposes-to-eliminate.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-5884435328107950255' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/5884435328107950255' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-611412620'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='January 21, 2012 7:29 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-4043110629822538018</id><published>2012-01-20T13:55:33.808-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-20T13:55:33.808-08:00</updated><title type='text'>I find this fascinating.  Will this make agencies ...</title><content type='html'>I find this fascinating.  Will this make agencies move towards RFPs rather than bids to assure competent workforces?  Why is the last paragraph needed - if they get rid of the state prevailing wage requirements, why do they need the sentence that says no one will be paid a prevailing wage on non-federal contracts?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/5884435328107950255/comments/default/4043110629822538018'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/5884435328107950255/comments/default/4043110629822538018'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2012/01/missouri-proposes-to-eliminate.html?showComment=1327096533808#c4043110629822538018' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2012/01/missouri-proposes-to-eliminate.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-5884435328107950255' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/5884435328107950255' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-2020123042'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='January 20, 2012 1:55 PM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-5860782082670374279</id><published>2011-12-29T08:48:17.132-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-29T08:48:17.132-08:00</updated><title type='text'>I disagree. They do it all the time in government ...</title><content type='html'>I disagree. They do it all the time in government contracts. The contracts are often silent in this regard and the contractors propose a &amp;quot;dream team&amp;quot; only to switched after contract award.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/8809171732153417984/comments/default/5860782082670374279'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/8809171732153417984/comments/default/5860782082670374279'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/06/preventing-bait-and-switch-of-key.html?showComment=1325177297132#c5860782082670374279' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/06/preventing-bait-and-switch-of-key.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-8809171732153417984' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/8809171732153417984' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-2000548973'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='December 29, 2011 8:48 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-5028863237786020174</id><published>2011-12-15T13:32:59.438-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-15T13:32:59.438-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Merry Christmas Mike - and thanks for your blog.  ...</title><content type='html'>Merry Christmas Mike - and thanks for your blog.  I know I speak for many when I say your writings are read, quoted, passed on, copy and pasted, and sometimes archived! You probably don&amp;#39;t get as much feedback as you should, so I&amp;#39;d like to take this time to thank you on behalf of the many readers that really appreciate the work you do.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/182215178081036045/comments/default/5028863237786020174'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/182215178081036045/comments/default/5028863237786020174'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/12/merry-christmas.html?showComment=1323984779438#c5028863237786020174' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/12/merry-christmas.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-182215178081036045' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/182215178081036045' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-2020123042'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='December 15, 2011 1:32 PM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-6990895298534423238</id><published>2011-12-13T05:52:28.892-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-13T05:52:28.892-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Thanks for your posts Mike;
Great list of actual i...</title><content type='html'>Thanks for your posts Mike;&lt;br /&gt;Great list of actual issues that regularly occur. I sat through a full day seminar with the&lt;br /&gt;Department of Transportation a few months ago. They spend an entire section of the seminar on exactly the same subject. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Claims of error as well as omission of a price are the 2 largest reason they state bids become problems and/or are disqualified or, the vendors take a bath. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We actually in the past year have had a national billion dollar company lose a bid for the price omission reason. Nobody really cried about that except the person who prepared the RFP for the company. &lt;br /&gt;http://www.alphagray.com</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/5934223922945399892/comments/default/6990895298534423238'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/5934223922945399892/comments/default/6990895298534423238'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/12/when-bad-things-happen-to-bids.html?showComment=1323784348892#c6990895298534423238' title=''/><author><name>Fred Siegel</name><uri>http://www.alphagray.com</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/12/when-bad-things-happen-to-bids.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-5934223922945399892' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/5934223922945399892' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-465276370'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='December 13, 2011 5:52 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-1910347668985066695</id><published>2011-11-21T09:29:29.131-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-21T09:29:29.131-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Happy early Thanksgiving to you sir!</title><content type='html'>Happy early Thanksgiving to you sir!</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/1177550772361786597/comments/default/1910347668985066695'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/1177550772361786597/comments/default/1910347668985066695'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/11/heart-of-thanksgiving.html?showComment=1321896569131#c1910347668985066695' title=''/><author><name>Elliot Volkman</name><uri>http://www.govwin.com</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/11/heart-of-thanksgiving.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-1177550772361786597' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/1177550772361786597' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-156751073'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='November 21, 2011 9:29 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-2934797801775214588</id><published>2011-11-18T02:56:08.141-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-18T02:56:08.141-08:00</updated><title type='text'>In my opinion the owner should be responsible for ...</title><content type='html'>In my opinion the owner should be responsible for the risk and take full responsibility for the project. Whoever pays needs to be responsible. In addition, the purchasing department should be held accountable when something goes wrong. No more of this getting everything commoditized, handing over to the engineers and operational folks and saying: make it work. The finger of blame always  gets pointed at the engineering staff and technical people at the owner and contractor&amp;#39;s offices, but it should be pointing squarely at the purchasing department and their tendering/bidding process. They should take the heat when things go wrong.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/137167483994842855/comments/default/2934797801775214588'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/137167483994842855/comments/default/2934797801775214588'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2008/02/commentary-on-best-value-procurement.html?showComment=1321613768141#c2934797801775214588' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2008/02/commentary-on-best-value-procurement.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-137167483994842855' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/137167483994842855' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1536099469'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='November 18, 2011 2:56 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-8467474299939313494</id><published>2011-10-06T03:49:29.885-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-06T03:49:29.885-07:00</updated><title type='text'>This is both a good news and having doubts about t...</title><content type='html'>This is both a good news and having doubts about the system. First, technology nowadays makes our work much more easier --which is great and I don&amp;#39;t have any problems with that. Although I hope they reviewed the software for any bugs or etc.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/7089697345485276735/comments/default/8467474299939313494'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/7089697345485276735/comments/default/8467474299939313494'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/01/federal-contractor-performance-database.html?showComment=1317898169885#c8467474299939313494' title=''/><author><name>Contractor CE</name><uri>http://www.industrialinstitute.com/contractor/contractor_continuing_education.cfm</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/01/federal-contractor-performance-database.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-7089697345485276735' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/7089697345485276735' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-2037372094'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='October 6, 2011 3:49 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-891301985943619935</id><published>2011-09-14T09:35:02.797-07:00</published><updated>2011-09-14T09:35:02.797-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Interesting approach to transparency. I would like...</title><content type='html'>Interesting approach to transparency. I would like to see what percentage of protests actually resulted in changing the award outcome and, what the main reason for the protest was. In my experience I have seen a very small percent of challenges result in a change. The ones which did usually were based on fraudulent information or misrepresentations by the procurement officer or, the winning bidder.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/3190592002386987507/comments/default/891301985943619935'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/3190592002386987507/comments/default/891301985943619935'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/09/massachusetts-launches-online-bid.html?showComment=1316018102797#c891301985943619935' title=''/><author><name>Fred</name><uri>http://www.alphagray.com</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/09/massachusetts-launches-online-bid.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-3190592002386987507' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/3190592002386987507' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1684031717'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='September 14, 2011 9:35 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-4695225662155812008</id><published>2011-09-13T07:18:28.850-07:00</published><updated>2011-09-13T07:18:28.850-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Bidders should be seeking out this info on every b...</title><content type='html'>Bidders should be seeking out this info on every bid. If every bidder called in to get these details you&amp;#39;d see letters go out consistently.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/6978658003368694700/comments/default/4695225662155812008'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/6978658003368694700/comments/default/4695225662155812008'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/09/should-agencies-send-non-responsive.html?showComment=1315923508850#c4695225662155812008' title=''/><author><name>Carol Hagen</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06303298736658582290</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='24' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PKAbf5sU9BI/THvQsgjBW7I/AAAAAAAAABE/0t2lAKd_qes/S220/STA71063.JPG'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/09/should-agencies-send-non-responsive.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-6978658003368694700' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/6978658003368694700' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1740589944'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='September 13, 2011 7:18 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-6098312268803331564</id><published>2011-09-12T12:49:46.098-07:00</published><updated>2011-09-12T12:49:46.098-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Fantastic to hear this Mike. Not that fraud may ha...</title><content type='html'>Fantastic to hear this Mike. Not that fraud may have been committed but there actually may be some enforcement and consequences. A strong message must be sent to companies who knowingly defraud our Set Asides system out of BILLIONS of dollars each year. I hope this company and, people involved get jail time and restitution of every dollars stolen through fraud.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/7590209965781532646/comments/default/6098312268803331564'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/7590209965781532646/comments/default/6098312268803331564'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/09/feds-investigating-chicago-minority.html?showComment=1315856986098#c6098312268803331564' title=''/><author><name>Fred</name><uri>http://www.alphagray.com</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/09/feds-investigating-chicago-minority.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-7590209965781532646' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/7590209965781532646' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1529070250'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='September 12, 2011 12:49 PM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-7236942886983456127</id><published>2011-09-09T05:22:04.717-07:00</published><updated>2011-09-09T05:22:04.717-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Good point, Dennis.  Thanks for your comment that ...</title><content type='html'>Good point, Dennis.  Thanks for your comment that the single point of contact must be available, and watch the size of their voice mail and e-mail in boxes.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/2894447157641450378/comments/default/7236942886983456127'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/2894447157641450378/comments/default/7236942886983456127'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/09/who-may-have-contact-with-bidders.html?showComment=1315570924717#c7236942886983456127' title=''/><author><name>Mike Purdy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15239516189299153384</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='09880450309477082950'/><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/09/who-may-have-contact-with-bidders.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-2894447157641450378' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/2894447157641450378' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-611412620'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='September 9, 2011 5:22 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-8211239448634073072</id><published>2011-09-09T04:23:17.734-07:00</published><updated>2011-09-09T04:23:17.734-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Mike, if a single point of contact is designated, ...</title><content type='html'>Mike, if a single point of contact is designated, that single point of contact has to be available and responsive. I&amp;#39;ve been involved with Federal contracts where the official single point of contact had a full voicemail box that one could never add messages to -- you had to know the &amp;quot;secret&amp;quot; phone number in order to leave a message or get a response. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dennis McDonald&lt;br /&gt;Alexandria, Virginia&lt;br /&gt;http://www.ddmcd.com</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/2894447157641450378/comments/default/8211239448634073072'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/2894447157641450378/comments/default/8211239448634073072'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/09/who-may-have-contact-with-bidders.html?showComment=1315567397734#c8211239448634073072' title=''/><author><name>Dennis</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14737590581329934646</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://bp0.blogger.com/_Cj39jzzr5Vw/SHtxNPdvVdI/AAAAAAAAAAM/yhKYrPmcpXo/S220/logo7.jpg'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/09/who-may-have-contact-with-bidders.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-2894447157641450378' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/2894447157641450378' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1421228078'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='September 9, 2011 4:23 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-5925526530770303225</id><published>2011-09-08T18:57:56.237-07:00</published><updated>2011-09-08T18:57:56.237-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Mike,
I certainly enjoyed reading your blog about ...</title><content type='html'>Mike,&lt;br /&gt;I certainly enjoyed reading your blog about prevailing wage projects and your four tracking tools. You and I are in agreement on this subject and as a result I am a new subscriber to your blog.&lt;br /&gt;Most of our clients have smaller projects under $1M and some of them do a good job of maintaining job logs and documenting the activities on their job sites; others need a bit of encouragement.&lt;br /&gt;Perhaps if I share some of your blog posts it may help because you write from the perspective of larger contractors who have similar issues and a lot more at risk.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Warm Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Randal DeHart&lt;br /&gt;www.fasteasyaccounting.com</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/7132064029210419469/comments/default/5925526530770303225'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/7132064029210419469/comments/default/5925526530770303225'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2010/03/managing-mystery-subcontractors-on.html?showComment=1315533476237#c5925526530770303225' title=''/><author><name>Randal L DeHart</name><uri>http://www.fasteasyaccounting.com/</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2010/03/managing-mystery-subcontractors-on.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-7132064029210419469' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/7132064029210419469' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-2135900941'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='September 8, 2011 6:57 PM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-5389714587505733307</id><published>2011-09-06T05:59:14.376-07:00</published><updated>2011-09-06T05:59:14.376-07:00</updated><title type='text'>In Washington State, for a public works project wi...</title><content type='html'>In Washington State, for a public works project without federal funding, there are no state requirements for sole proprietors to submit weekly certified payrolls, unless you have a particular state funding source that may require it, perhaps due to the fact that their money originally was federal money. Please contact me directly if you&amp;#39;d like to discuss this issue further.  I&amp;#39;m interested in what state agencies have told you.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/6065982804070401090/comments/default/5389714587505733307'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/6065982804070401090/comments/default/5389714587505733307'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/08/is-sole-proprietor-exempt-from.html?showComment=1315313954376#c5389714587505733307' title=''/><author><name>Mike Purdy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15239516189299153384</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='09880450309477082950'/><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/08/is-sole-proprietor-exempt-from.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-6065982804070401090' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/6065982804070401090' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-611412620'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='September 6, 2011 5:59 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-6237938210867531427</id><published>2011-09-01T07:40:16.156-07:00</published><updated>2011-09-01T07:40:16.156-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Do sole proprietors have to submit weekly certifie...</title><content type='html'>Do sole proprietors have to submit weekly certified payrolls?  I have received varying answers to this question from state agencies depending on who I talk to.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/6065982804070401090/comments/default/6237938210867531427'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/6065982804070401090/comments/default/6237938210867531427'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/08/is-sole-proprietor-exempt-from.html?showComment=1314888016156#c6237938210867531427' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/08/is-sole-proprietor-exempt-from.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-6065982804070401090' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/6065982804070401090' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-741472335'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='September 1, 2011 7:40 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-2700395536908798503</id><published>2011-09-01T07:21:31.008-07:00</published><updated>2011-09-01T07:21:31.008-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Thank you for that information Mike. I never reall...</title><content type='html'>Thank you for that information Mike. I never really gave the exception much thought as I always had worked with larger firms and their staff. I am now representing several small businesses who have only themselves or, an equal partner in the business. This is especially true of many of the consultants I now work with. I will check my state rules here in Arizona. This was an eye opener for me today. Thank you. &lt;br /&gt;Fred Siegel</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/6065982804070401090/comments/default/2700395536908798503'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/6065982804070401090/comments/default/2700395536908798503'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/08/is-sole-proprietor-exempt-from.html?showComment=1314886891008#c2700395536908798503' title=''/><author><name>Fred</name><uri>http://www.alphagray.com</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/08/is-sole-proprietor-exempt-from.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-6065982804070401090' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/6065982804070401090' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-688027347'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='September 1, 2011 7:21 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-5485982628261161718</id><published>2011-08-29T07:31:22.797-07:00</published><updated>2011-08-29T07:31:22.797-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Thanks for the re-post Mike!</title><content type='html'>Thanks for the re-post Mike!</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/4000169720481485848/comments/default/5485982628261161718'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/4000169720481485848/comments/default/5485982628261161718'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/08/what-is-deadline-for-contractor-to.html?showComment=1314628282797#c5485982628261161718' title=''/><author><name>Matt</name><uri>http://www.bestpracticesconstructionlaw.com</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/08/what-is-deadline-for-contractor-to.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-4000169720481485848' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/4000169720481485848' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-527899362'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='August 29, 2011 7:31 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-2476681768450718956</id><published>2011-08-27T09:07:47.152-07:00</published><updated>2011-08-27T09:07:47.152-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Yes, I think you&amp;#39;re right about the preconstru...</title><content type='html'>Yes, I think you&amp;#39;re right about the preconstruction contract being exempt from sales tax if the construction contract under Rule 171 is exempt from sales tax.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/2343170482084723479/comments/default/2476681768450718956'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/2343170482084723479/comments/default/2476681768450718956'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/08/are-pre-construction-services-under.html?showComment=1314461267152#c2476681768450718956' title=''/><author><name>Mike Purdy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15239516189299153384</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='09880450309477082950'/><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/08/are-pre-construction-services-under.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-2343170482084723479' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/2343170482084723479' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-611412620'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='August 27, 2011 9:07 AM'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-5340480270918528929</id><published>2011-08-23T10:54:27.819-07:00</published><updated>2011-08-23T10:54:27.819-07:00</updated><title type='text'>So applying the same rule, where the construction ...</title><content type='html'>So applying the same rule, where the construction contract is exempt from sales tax per Rule 171, the precon contract would aslo be exempt.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/2343170482084723479/comments/default/5340480270918528929'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/2343170482084723479/comments/default/5340480270918528929'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/08/are-pre-construction-services-under.html?showComment=1314122067819#c5340480270918528929' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://publiccontracting.blogspot.com/2011/08/are-pre-construction-services-under.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271900052374447274.post-2343170482084723479' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3271900052374447274/posts/default/2343170482084723479' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-641655687'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='August 23, 2011 10:54 AM'/></entry></feed>
